Agreements - Do you use an experienced Scrum Master (or Project Manager)?

Updated by Brady Stroud [SSW] 1 year ago. See history

123
No component provided for introEmbed

It's generally best for the Scrum Master not to be a member of the development team. This way they can stay objective and it creates more of a ceremony when they turn up.

Tip: If they are trying to be a member of the development team and a Scrum Master, call them a 'Semi Scrum Master" as they often don't do as good a job.

Here is a common way a project goes with a Scrum Master involved:

  • The Sprint Backlog is approved by the Product Owner (the customer)
  • The development team works on the Sprint Backlog (usually 2 weeks)... The Scrum Master is ensuring the client is kept up-to-date (via the Review, Retro, and Planning meetings) #1
  • The Scrum Master is ensuring the client is kept up-to-date (via the 4 reports)
  • The Account Manager is booking in future Sprints (after the Planning Meeting)
  • The Account Manager invoices (usually every week).

This is much better than the old waterfall method which goes like this:

  • The specification is approved by the customer
  • The development team is working to the specifications for some months (but can be from anywhere from 2 months to 2 years)
  • The Project Manager is ensuring the client is kept up-to-date (via ad hoc meetings)
  • The Account Manager sends invoices when milestones are met.

Insist that your Scrum Master (aka Project Manager) maintains a strict project schedule.

For Scrum Projects: In Scrum projects, the role of a Project Manager is split into three roles: Scrum Master, Product Owner, and the team. Each role is essential.

For more information go to Scrum Terms and Scrum Roles.

Acknowledgements

Adam Cogan
Related rules

Need help?

SSW Consulting has over 30 years of experience developing awesome software solutions.

We open source.Loving SSW Rules? Star us on GitHub. Star